NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 42 billion / sec
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 480
- Around 82% better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1848 MHz (3696 data rate)
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 34.483
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3320
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3320
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 26 March 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 42 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 vs 34.483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 vs 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 vs 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 vs 3805
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 421
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13144 vs 12810
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 vs 3.631
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.405 vs 13.832
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 vs 78.867
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 vs 4868
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 vs 4868
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 vs 3805 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 421 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13144 vs 12810 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 vs 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 vs 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 vs 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 vs 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 vs 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 vs 4868 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3805 | 4121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12810 | 13144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | 34.483 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | 706.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 4.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | 30.405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | 106.875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | 5110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | 5110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3320 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 26 March 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 756 | 758 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $71.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 700 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | 42 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | 2-way, 3-way |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 420
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
