NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 42 billion / sec
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 480
- Environ 82% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 1,345.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 35% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1848 MHz (3696 data rate)
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 34.483
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 versus 3658
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3320
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 versus 3658
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3320
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 versus 26 March 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 42 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 480 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 1,345.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 34.483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 versus 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 versus 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3320 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 versus 3805
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 versus 421
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13144 versus 12810
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 versus 3.631
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.405 versus 13.832
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 versus 78.867
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 versus 4868
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 versus 4868
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 versus 3805 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 versus 421 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13144 versus 12810 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 versus 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 versus 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 versus 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 versus 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 versus 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 versus 4868 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3805 | 4121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12810 | 13144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | 34.483 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | 706.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 4.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | 30.405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | 106.875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | 5110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | 5110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3320 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 | 26 March 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 756 | 758 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $71.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | 480 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s | 42 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | 2-way, 3-way |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 420
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
