NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 915 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3072 vs 2208
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10427 vs 4950
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.828 vs 16.41
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 1.346
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 4238
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 4238
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2014 vs 21 October 2010 |
Boost clock speed | 915 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 vs 2208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 vs 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 vs 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 vs 1.346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 4238 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 640
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 226
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 vs 210.585
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.514 vs 28.662
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 vs 162.83
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3684
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1120 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 vs 210.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 vs 28.662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 vs 162.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | 2208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 | 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | 1.346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Barts |
Launch date | 10 March 2014 | 21 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 853 | 812 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 915 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 220 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |