NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 2.933
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.662 vs 26.532
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 vs 133.458
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 4843
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 4843
- 9.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1151 vs 117
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 vs 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 vs 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 vs 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 vs 117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3072
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 226
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 10427
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 22.828
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 210.585
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 3072 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 10427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 22.828 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 210.585 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
Launch date | 10 March 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 853 | 707 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 915 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 1020 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Blu Ray 3D |