NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 versus 2.933
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.662 versus 26.532
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 versus 133.458
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 versus 4843
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 versus 4843
- 9.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1151 versus 117
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 versus 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 versus 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 versus 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 versus 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 versus 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 versus 117 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 3072
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 226
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 10427
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 22.828
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 210.585
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 915 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 3072 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 226 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 10427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 210.585 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 10 March 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 853 | 707 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 915 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 or 640 | 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAT400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AppleM2 8-core
