NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 2.933
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.662 vs 26.532
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 vs 133.458
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 4843
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 4843
- 9.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1151 vs 117
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 vs 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 vs 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 vs 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 vs 117 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Etwa 28% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1020 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Etwa 19% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1085 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Etwa 25% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3072
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 226
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 10427
- Etwa 86% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 22.828
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 210.585
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 3072 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 226 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 10427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 210.585 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 | 117 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Codename | GK104 | GM107 |
| Startdatum | 10 March 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 853 | 707 |
| Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $299.01 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 915 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 797 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| CUDA-Kerne | 1152 or 640 | 640 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,389 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 640 | 640 |
| Texturfüllrate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| 7.1-Kanal HD-Audio auf HDMI | ||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP-Inhaltsschutz | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Unterstützung von LVDS-Signalen | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD und DTS-HD Audio Bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 80.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
| Standard-Speicherkonfiguration | GDDR5 | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M mit anderen
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAT400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AppleM2 8-core
