NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3057 vs 2722
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10435 vs 6670
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.828 vs 18.462
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 1.899
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.662 vs 23.742
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 vs 61.965
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3321
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3321
• Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1151 vs 817

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 421 vs 226
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 427.88 vs 210.585

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3057 2722
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	226 421
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10435 6670
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.828 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	210.585 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.427 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.662 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.83 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4938 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4938 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1151 817

Compare specifications (specs)