NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A vs AMD Radeon HD 8850M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A and AMD Radeon HD 8850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 39.72 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 59% better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2557 vs 973
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10292 vs 7447
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2557 vs 973 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10292 vs 7447 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8850M
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 258
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2286 vs 1973
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2286 vs 1973
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2795 vs 2188
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2795 vs 2188
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3323 vs 3289
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3323 vs 3289
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 vs 258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2286 vs 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2286 vs 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2795 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2795 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3323 vs 3289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3323 vs 3289 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8850M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | AMD Radeon HD 8850M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2557 | 973 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 258 | 502 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10292 | 7447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1973 | 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1973 | 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2188 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 | 3323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 435.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.637 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.378 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | AMD Radeon HD 8850M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Venus |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 926 | 928 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |