NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec
  • Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
  • Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 215 Watt
  • 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
  • Around 49% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 27.93
  • Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 97.852
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 3873
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3614
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3317
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 3873
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3614
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3317
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 March 2015 vs 26 March 2010
Texture fill rate 44.96 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec
Pipelines 640 vs 448
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 215 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1280 MB
Memory clock speed 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 42.396 vs 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.158 vs 97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4148 vs 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4148 vs 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3317

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

  • Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 914 MHz
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3119 vs 2580
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 217
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10908 vs 9741
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 vs 373.644
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.268 vs 2.54
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.309 vs 39.412
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1215 MHz vs 914 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3119 vs 2580
PassMark - G2D Mark 413 vs 217
Geekbench - OpenCL 10908 vs 9741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 980.005 vs 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.268 vs 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 47.309 vs 39.412

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2580
3119
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
217
413
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9741
10908
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42.396
27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
373.644
980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.54
3.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
39.412
47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
139.158
97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4148
3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4148
3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3317
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
PassMark - G3D Mark 2580 3119
PassMark - G2D Mark 217 413
Geekbench - OpenCL 9741 10908
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 42.396 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 373.644 980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.54 3.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 39.412 47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.158 97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4148 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4148 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3317
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3350 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Fermi
Code name GM107 GF100
Launch date 13 March 2015 26 March 2010
Place in performance rating 812 809
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $349
Price now $522.01
Value for money (0-100) 6.87

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 914 MHz 1215 MHz
CUDA cores 640 448
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops 1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 640 448
Texture fill rate 44.96 GTexel / s 34.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 215 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 3,100 million
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support 1
Audio input for HDMI Internal
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
SLI options 2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pins

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1280 MB
Memory bandwidth 32 or 80 GB / s 133.9 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 or 2500 MHz 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Memory type DDR3 or GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
3D Vision
Surround