NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 448
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 98% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 3176
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 362
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 11024
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 26.055
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 2.99
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 vs 89.869

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 428.6x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 792.44
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 vs 35.338
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3691
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3335
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3691
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3335

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6111 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	673 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	18734 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.733 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	792.44 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.888 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.338 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	200.825 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3691 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3691 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 9064

Compare specifications (specs)