NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs AMD FirePro W7000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and AMD FirePro W7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 950 MHz
• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 543
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3714
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3359
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3714
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000

• Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 76 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
• Around 75% better floating-point performance: 2,432 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4279 vs 2411
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18150 vs 12495
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.467 vs 49.772
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1148.367 vs 757.295
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.886 vs 3.67
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.472 vs 49.875
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 268.49 vs 179.567
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6475 vs 5157
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6475 vs 5157

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2411 4279
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	631 543
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12495 18150
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.772 52.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	757.295 1148.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.67 4.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.875 85.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	179.567 268.49
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5157 6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5834 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5157 6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5834 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3359

Compare specifications (specs)