NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 823 MHz
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5157 vs 3362
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3352
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5157 vs 3362
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3352
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 March 2015 vs 8 March 2011
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 823 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,389 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5157 vs 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7859 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5157 vs 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7859 vs 3352

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

  • Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 5834
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 5834
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 52.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6895 vs 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6895 vs 5834

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5157
3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5834
6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7859
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5157
3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5834
6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7859
3352
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 2411
PassMark - G2D Mark 631
Geekbench - OpenCL 12495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 757.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 49.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 179.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5157 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5834 6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7859 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5157 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5834 6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7859 3352

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Fermi 2.0
Code name GM107 GF114
Launch date 13 March 2015 8 March 2011
Place in performance rating 475 471
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1085 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 823 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,389 gflops 1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 640 384
Texture fill rate 43.4 GTexel / s 52.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 170 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 229 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s 128.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 4008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5