NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5157 vs 3362
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3352
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5157 vs 3362
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 8 March 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 vs 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 vs 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 5834
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 5834
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6895 vs 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6895 vs 5834 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2411 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 | 6895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 | 6895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 | 3352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GF114 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 8 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 475 | 471 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 823 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |