NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 889 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 980 MHz
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 594
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.875 vs 22.384
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3679
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3353
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3679
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

• 4.9x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 4.5x more pipelines: 2880 vs 640
• 4.1x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9047 vs 2411
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26079 vs 12495
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 vs 49.772
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1293.474 vs 757.295
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 3.67
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 290.861 vs 179.567
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 5157
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 5157

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2411 9047
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	631 594
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12495 26079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.772 72.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	757.295 1293.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.67 7.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.875 22.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	179.567 290.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5157 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5834 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5157 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5834 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3353

Compare specifications (specs)