NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs AMD Radeon HD 7670M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and AMD Radeon HD 7670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 3.3x more texture fill rate: 47.04 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,505 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3370 vs 470
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 vs 82
• 7.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11003 vs 1393
• 22x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 2.47
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 210.901
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 1228
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2194
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3341
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 1228
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2194
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3341

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670M

• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3370 470
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	245 82
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11003 1393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.294 2.47
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	795.325 210.901
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5264 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 2194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5264 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 2194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3341

Compare specifications (specs)