NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 63% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 versus 39.934
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 versus 705.616
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 versus 3.631
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 versus 13.832
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 versus 78.867
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 versus 4868
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3679
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 versus 4868
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3679
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 11 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 versus 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 versus 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 versus 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 versus 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 versus 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 versus 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 versus 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 47.04 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- Environ 63% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 1,505 gflops
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3799 versus 3368
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 versus 245
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12810 versus 11010
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1466 versus 1231
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 1,505 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3799 versus 3368 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 versus 245 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12810 versus 11010 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 versus 1231 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 | 3799 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11010 | 12810 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 11 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 761 | 755 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 47.04 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | Up to 2048x1536 |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
AMDRadeon 630
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
