NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 357.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 35.338
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3691
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3335
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3691
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3335
  • 7.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1231 vs 162
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 March 2015 vs 22 January 2015
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 795.325 vs 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.794 vs 35.338
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1231 vs 162

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 1096 MHz
  • Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 47.04 GTexel / s
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
  • Around 60% better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 1,505 gflops
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 3366
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 245
  • Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 10985
  • Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 54.294
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 3.692
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 vs 174.513
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 5264
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 5264
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1127 MHz vs 1096 MHz
Boost clock speed 1178 MHz vs 1176 MHz
Texture fill rate 72 billion / sec vs 47.04 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1024 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2,413 gflops vs 1,505 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6111 vs 3366
PassMark - G2D Mark 673 vs 245
Geekbench - OpenCL 18734 vs 10985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 73.733 vs 54.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.888 vs 3.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 200.825 vs 174.513
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7218 vs 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7218 vs 5264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3366
6111
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
245
673
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10985
18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
54.294
73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
795.325
792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.692
4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
51.794
35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
174.513
200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5264
7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5264
7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
1231
162
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
PassMark - G3D Mark 3366 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark 245 673
Geekbench - OpenCL 10985 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.294 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 795.325 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.692 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.794 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 174.513 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5264 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5264 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1231 162

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Maxwell 2.0
Code name GM107 GM206
Launch date 13 March 2015 22 January 2015
Place in performance rating 735 514
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $199
Price now $229.99
Value for money (0-100) 34.63

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1176 MHz 1178 MHz
Core clock speed 1096 MHz 1127 MHz
CUDA cores 640 1024
Floating-point performance 1,505 gflops 2,413 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 1024
Texture fill rate 47.04 GTexel / s 72 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 2,940 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support 1
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt
SLI options 2x
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pins

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s 112 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI