NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 947 MHz
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 148 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9638 vs 8293
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 89.325
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 6300
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 6300
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 vs 5 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9638 vs 8293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 vs 89.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 6300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 6300 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 151.5 GTexel / s vs 109 billion / sec
- Around 54% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1664
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 4,849 gflops vs 3,920 gflops
- 714.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 769
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 28476
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1366.314 vs 1225.96
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.034 vs 8.76
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.765 vs 35.714
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 540.645 vs 489.884
- Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3683 vs 3626
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 151.5 GTexel / s vs 109 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1664 |
Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops vs 3,920 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 vs 28476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 vs 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 vs 8.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 vs 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 vs 489.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3683 vs 3626 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9638 | 8293 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 | 775 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28476 | 102277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | 89.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | 1366.314 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.76 | 10.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | 98.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 | 540.645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | 6300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | 6300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3626 | 3683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 | 5 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 363 | 360 |
Price now | $407.76 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 947 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | 4,849 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1664 | 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec | 151.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 320.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |