NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 148 Watt vs 165 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 489.884 vs 477.015
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 9566
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 9566
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt vs 165 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 vs 477.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1216 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 144 billion / sec vs 109 billion / sec
- Around 23% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1664
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 4,981 gflops vs 3,920 gflops
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11100 vs 9637
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 vs 769
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34824 vs 28441
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 110.006 vs 105.107
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1348.307 vs 1225.96
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.194 vs 8.76
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.443 vs 35.714
- Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4321 vs 3626
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec vs 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1664 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops vs 3,920 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11100 vs 9637 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 vs 769 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34824 vs 28441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 vs 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 vs 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 vs 8.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 vs 35.714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4321 vs 3626 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9637 | 11100 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 | 792 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28441 | 34824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | 110.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | 1348.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.76 | 9.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | 37.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 | 477.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3626 | 4321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 19 September 2014 | 19 September 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $549 |
| Place in performance rating | 365 | 366 |
| Price now | $407.76 | $605.06 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | 21.18 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | 1216 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | 4,981 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1664 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec | 144 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt | 165 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | 500 Watt |
| SLI options | 4x | 1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | 2x 6-pins |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
ATIFireGL V8600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
IntelArc A370M
