NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Etwa 11% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 148 Watt vs 165 Watt
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 477.015
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 9566
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 9566
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 148 Watt vs 165 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 vs 477.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3335 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1216 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- Etwa 32% höhere Texturfüllrate: 144 billion / sec vs 109 billion / sec
- Etwa 23% höhere Leitungssysteme: 2048 vs 1664
- Etwa 27% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 4,981 gflops vs 3,920 gflops
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11112 vs 9640
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 766
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34898 vs 28498
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 110.006 vs 105.107
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1348.307 vs 1225.96
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.194 vs 8.737
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.443 vs 35.714
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 474 vs 369
| Spezifikationen | |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1216 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 144 billion / sec vs 109 billion / sec |
| Leitungssysteme | 2048 vs 1664 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4,981 gflops vs 3,920 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11112 vs 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34898 vs 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 vs 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 vs 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 vs 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 vs 35.714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 474 vs 369 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 | 11112 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 | 34898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | 110.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | 1348.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 | 9.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | 37.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 | 477.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 | 474 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
| Startdatum | 19 September 2014 | 19 September 2014 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | $549 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 371 | 379 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $407.76 | $605.06 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 28.59 | 21.18 |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1178 MHz | 1216 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1050 MHz | |
| CUDA-Kerne | 1664 | 2048 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 3,920 gflops | 4,981 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 98 °C | |
| Leitungssysteme | 1664 | 2048 |
| Texturfüllrate | 109 billion / sec | 144 billion / sec |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 148 Watt | 165 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,200 million | 5,200 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | 1 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 500 Watt | 500 Watt |
| SLI-Optionen | 4x | 1 |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 6-pins | 2x 6-pins |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 224 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 7.0 GB/s | 7.0 GB/s |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||

