NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs AMD Radeon HD 7550M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and AMD Radeon HD 7550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 89% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 6.9x more texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 400
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 12.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5709 vs 465
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19031 vs 5371
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 7 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 400 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5709 vs 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19031 vs 5371 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7550M
- 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 81 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 403 vs 385
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 81 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 vs 385 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7550M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | AMD Radeon HD 7550M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5709 | 465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 403 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19031 | 5371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | AMD Radeon HD 7550M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM204 | Thames |
| Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 7 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | |
| Place in performance rating | 558 | 561 |
| Price now | $1,899 | |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAP104-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
