NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 902 MHz
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 81 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 59.428 vs 30.133
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3582
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3582
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 10 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 vs 30.133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 3331 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 173.2 GTexel / s vs 83.04 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- Around 56% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2,657 gflops
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 vs 1113.788
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 4.157
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 vs 39.101
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 148.747 vs 81.909
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 8546
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 8546
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 173.2 GTexel / s vs 83.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 2,657 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 vs 1113.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 vs 4.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 vs 39.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.747 vs 81.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 vs 8546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 vs 8546 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5724 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | 1441.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 10 September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | $649 |
| Place in performance rating | 558 | 555 |
| Price now | $1,899 | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 863 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s | 173.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
