NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 863 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 902 MHz
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 81 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 59.428 vs 30.133
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3582
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3582

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 173.2 GTexel / s vs 83.04 GTexel / s
• Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
• Around 56% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2,657 gflops
• 2.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 vs 1113.788
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 4.157
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 vs 39.101
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 148.747 vs 81.909
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 8546
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 8546

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.428 30.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1113.788 1441.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.157 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.101 64.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.909 148.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8546 9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3342 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8546 9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3342 3331

Compare specifications (specs)