NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M versus AMD FirePro W5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and AMD FirePro W5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 924 MHz versus 825 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 83.04 GTexel / s versus 39.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 768
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,657 gflops versus 1,267 gflops
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 81 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5720 versus 2979
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19018 versus 9969
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1113.788 versus 771.327
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.157 versus 2.758
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 versus 4308
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 versus 4308
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 versus 7 August 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 83.04 GTexel / s versus 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,657 gflops versus 1,267 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5720 versus 2979 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19018 versus 9969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 versus 771.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 versus 2.758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 versus 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 versus 4308 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5000
- Environ 28% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 570 versus 385
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3342
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3342
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 versus 385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3342 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | AMD FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5720 | 2979 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 570 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19018 | 9969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | 771.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | 2.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | AMD FirePro W5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM204 | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 | 7 August 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | $599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 558 | 559 |
| Prix maintenant | $1,899 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,657 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 83.04 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Longeur | 183 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 120 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAP104-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
