NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs ATI Radeon E2400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 54% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 34.6x more texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 1280 vs 40
• 55.4x better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 48 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 48x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 128 MB
• Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• 109.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5691 vs 52
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 378 vs 287

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400

• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 81 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5691 52
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	378 287

Compare specifications (specs)