NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 924 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1038 MHz versus 902 MHz
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 81 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 59.428 versus 30.133
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 3582
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 3582
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 versus 10 September 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz versus 863 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz versus 902 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 versus 30.133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 173.2 GTexel / s versus 83.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 80% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1280
- Environ 56% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,156 gflops versus 2,657 gflops
- 2.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 versus 1113.788
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 versus 4.157
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 versus 39.101
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 148.747 versus 81.909
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 versus 8546
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 versus 8546
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 173.2 GTexel / s versus 83.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops versus 2,657 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 versus 1113.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 versus 4.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 versus 39.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.747 versus 81.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 versus 8546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 versus 8546 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5724 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | 1441.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM204 | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 | 10 September 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | $649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 558 | 555 |
| Prix maintenant | $1,899 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,657 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2304 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 83.04 GTexel / s | 173.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 120 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
