NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 950 MHz
• 7.3x more pipelines: 2816 vs 384
• 9.3x better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
• 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
• 11.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 vs 1202
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 239
• 11.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 3802
• 14.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 9.947
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 vs 340.824
• 11.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 0.982
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.16 vs 18.773
• 34.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 23.111
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 2283
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3299
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 1913
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 2283
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3299
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 1913
• 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1321 vs 414

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

• 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 257.1x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13758 1202
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	852 239
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	42988 3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.843 9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1722.98 340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.661 0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.16 18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	788.464 23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10471 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3695 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10471 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3695 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1321 414

Compare specifications (specs)