NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 13% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1075 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 7.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2816 vs 384
- 9.3x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 6,060 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
- 6x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 11.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 vs 1202
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 239
- 11.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 3802
- 14.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 9.947
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 vs 340.824
- 11.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 0.982
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.16 vs 18.773
- 34.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 23.111
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 2283
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3299
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 1913
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 2283
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3299
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 1913
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1321 vs 414
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 2 June 2015 vs 22 March 2012 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1075 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 2816 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 6,060 gflops vs 652.8 gflops |
Maximale Speichergröße | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13758 vs 1202 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 vs 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 vs 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 vs 9.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 vs 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 vs 0.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 vs 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 vs 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 vs 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 vs 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 vs 1913 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1321 vs 414 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- 5.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 257.1x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13758 | 1202 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 | 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 | 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | 9.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | 0.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 1913 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1321 | 414 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Codename | GM200 | GK107 |
Startdatum | 2 June 2015 | 22 March 2012 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $649 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 310 | 1188 |
Jetzt kaufen | $679.99 | |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1075 MHz | 950 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | |
CUDA-Kerne | 2816 | 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 6,060 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 2816 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 176 billion / sec | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 45 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 8,000 million | 1,270 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI-Optionen | 4x | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 6-pin + 8-pin | |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 336.5 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 Bit | 128bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7.0 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |