NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1075 MHz versus 950 MHz
7.3x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 384
9.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,060 gflops versus 652.8 gflops
6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1 GB
11.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 versus 1202
3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 versus 239
11.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 versus 3802
14.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 9.947
5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 versus 340.824
11.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 versus 0.982
Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.16 versus 18.773
34.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 versus 23.111
4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 versus 2283
Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 3299
Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 versus 1913
4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 versus 2283
Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 3299
Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 versus 1913
3.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1321 versus 414

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	2 June 2015 versus 22 March 2012
Vitesse augmenté	1075 MHz versus 950 MHz
Pipelines	2816 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops versus 652.8 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	6 GB versus 1 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	13758 versus 1202
PassMark - G2D Mark	852 versus 239
Geekbench - OpenCL	42988 versus 3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843 versus 9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.98 versus 340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661 versus 0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	37.16 versus 18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464 versus 23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471 versus 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695 versus 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3338 versus 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471 versus 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695 versus 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3338 versus 1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1321 versus 414

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

5.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 250 Watt
257.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt versus 250 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	1800 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13758

1202

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

852

239

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42988

3802

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

145.843

9.947

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1722.98

340.824

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.661

0.982

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37.16

18.773

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

788.464

23.111

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10471

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3338

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10471

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3338

1913

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1321

414

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark	13758	1202
PassMark - G2D Mark	852	239
Geekbench - OpenCL	42988	3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843	9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.98	340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661	0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	37.16	18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464	23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3338	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3338	1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1321	414

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Nom de code	GM200	GK107
Date de sortie	2 June 2015	22 March 2012
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$649
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	310	1188
Prix maintenant	$679.99
Genre	Desktop	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	23.43
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1075 MHz	950 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1000 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	2816	384
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops	652.8 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2816	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	176 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	45 Watt
Compte de transistor	8,000 million	1,270 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI	Internal
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Résolution VGA maximale	2048x1536	Up to 2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
HDMI
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	600 Watt
Options SLI	4x
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	6-pin + 8-pin
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	6 GB	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	336.5 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	384 Bit	128bit
Vitesse de mémoire	7.0 GB/s	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3\GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround
3D Blu-Ray
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus