NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 11.1x more texture fill rate: 144 billion / sec vs 13 billion / sec
- 32x more pipelines: 2048 vs 64
- 38.9x better floating-point performance: 4,981 gflops vs 128 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 22x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11113 vs 504
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 407
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 vs 3 March 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec vs 13 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops vs 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11113 vs 504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 407 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 165 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 165 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11113 | 504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 407 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34898 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GM204 | G94 |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 | 3 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Place in performance rating | 379 | 384 |
Price now | $605.06 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2048 | 64 |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops | 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec | 13 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 505 million |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 1 | 2-way |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |