NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs AMD Radeon 530
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and AMD Radeon 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 1030
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 174
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 2021
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 2021
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 2246
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 2246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 vs 1030 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 vs 174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 2246 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 965 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 1031.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 800 GFLOPs vs 762.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5014 vs 4256
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 965 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs vs 762.6 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5014 vs 4256 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 530
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | AMD Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 | 1030 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 | 5014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | AMD Radeon 530 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Code name | GM108 | Meso |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 891 | 1099 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 800 GFLOPs |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 24.58 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 48 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | DDR3/GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX110 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
