NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 18.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 117
- 32.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 108.2
- 28x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 119.7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 8 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 119.7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 1536 vs 256
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 2197
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 3502
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 3352
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 vs 2197 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 vs 3502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1424 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4269 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 6912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 6710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 6703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 119.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 8 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 906 | 909 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 797 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |