NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 945M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce 945M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2278 vs 2106
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9425 vs 8099
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 28.633
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 380.461
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.988
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 31.027
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 107.094
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 2961
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3683
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 2961
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3683

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 243 vs 215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2278 2106
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	215 243
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9425 8099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 28.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 380.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 1.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 31.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 107.094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 2961
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 2961
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3343

Compare specifications (specs)