NVIDIA GeForce MX150 versus NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce 945M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 58% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 46.98 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,127 gflops versus 953.9 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 7.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2278 versus 2109
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9425 versus 8099
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 versus 28.633
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 versus 380.461
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 versus 1.988
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 versus 31.027
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 versus 107.094
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 versus 2961
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 3683
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 versus 2961
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 3683
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 27 October 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops versus 953.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2278 versus 2109 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9425 versus 8099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 versus 28.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 versus 380.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 versus 1.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 versus 31.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 versus 107.094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 versus 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 versus 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 937 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 versus 215
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 937 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 versus 215 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2278 | 2109 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 215 | 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9425 | 8099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 28.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 380.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 1.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 31.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 107.094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 989 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GP108 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 27 October 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 905 | 961 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s | 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX150 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1150 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
