NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 928 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 11x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 110 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9428 vs 7902
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 23.168
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 2.141
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 28.29
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 47.404
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 3948
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3335
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 3948
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3335
• Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 989 vs 881

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 46.98 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2523 vs 2278
• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 409 vs 215
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 495.238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2278 2523
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	215 409
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9428 7902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	989 881

Compare specifications (specs)