NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus AMD Radeon Vega 11
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon Vega 11 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2412 versus 1842
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 versus 41.582
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 versus 371.843
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 2156
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 2475
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 2156
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 2475
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 13 February 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2412 versus 1842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 versus 41.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 versus 371.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 83% de pipelines plus haut: 704 versus 384
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 240
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13226 versus 9236
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.156 versus 2.64
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 versus 44.7
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 versus 141.816
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Pipelines | 704 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 240 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13226 versus 9236 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 versus 2.64 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 versus 44.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 versus 141.816 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 11
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2412 | 1842 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 | 13226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 41.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 371.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 3.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 52.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 248.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | GP108B | Owl |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 13 February 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 902 | 903 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 300 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 704 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 4,940 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | System Shared |