NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus AMD Radeon Vega 11
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon Vega 11 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2407 versus 1838
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 versus 41.582
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 versus 371.843
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 2156
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 2475
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 2156
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 2475
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 13 February 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2407 versus 1838 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 versus 41.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 versus 371.843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 83% de pipelines plus haut: 704 versus 384
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 versus 240
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13288 versus 9265
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.156 versus 2.64
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 versus 44.7
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 versus 141.816
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Pipelines | 704 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 versus 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13288 versus 9265 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 versus 2.64 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 versus 44.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 versus 141.816 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 11
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2407 | 1838 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 485 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9265 | 13288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 41.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 371.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 3.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 52.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 248.838 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | GP108B | Owl |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 13 February 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 902 | 903 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 704 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 4,940 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX250 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAT400
