NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
3.4x more core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 450 MHz
2125.6x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 18 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10706 vs 3773
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2405 vs 998
6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 543
6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 543
7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2784 vs 374
7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2784 vs 374
17.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 218
17.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 218

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 22 February 2011
Core clock speed	1531 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.26 GTexel/s vs 18 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 240
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	10706 vs 3773
PassMark - G3D Mark	2405 vs 998
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 543
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2784 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2784 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3808 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3808 vs 218

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Around 66% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 228

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	315 vs 228

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10706

3773

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

228

315

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2405

998

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

543

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

543

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2784

374

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2784

374

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3808

218

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3808

218

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX330	NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Geekbench - OpenCL	10706	3773
PassMark - G2D Mark	228	315
PassMark - G3D Mark	2405	998
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	543
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	543
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2784	374
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2784	374
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3808	218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3808	218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		325.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		13.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		27.961

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX330	NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Code name	GP108	GF104
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	22 February 2011
Place in performance rating	757	1502
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$398.96
Price now		$199.95
Value for money (0-100)		7.98
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1594 MHz
Core clock speed	1531 MHz	450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	38.26 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	19.13 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,224 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	240
Pixel fill rate	25.50 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.26 GTexel/s	18 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1800 million	1,950 million
Floating-point performance		432.0 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	48.06 GB/s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0