NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce MX550

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 1029 MHz
Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 1098 MHz
961.7x more texture fill rate: 42.24 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 55 Watt
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 396 vs 336
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4527 vs 3446
4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34265 vs 8148
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.448 vs 47.281
Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1017.021 vs 782.113
Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.996 vs 3.5
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.46 vs 51.048
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 587.99 vs 172.896

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2022 vs 3 December 2015
Core clock speed	1065 MHz vs 1029 MHz
Boost clock speed	1320 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Texture fill rate	42.24 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 55 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	396 vs 336
PassMark - G3D Mark	4527 vs 3446
Geekbench - OpenCL	34265 vs 8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	102.448 vs 47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1017.021 vs 782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.996 vs 3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	87.46 vs 51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	587.99 vs 172.896

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
3.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective

Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

396

336

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4527

3446

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

34265

8148

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

102.448

47.281

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1017.021

782.113

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.996

3.5

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.46

51.048

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

587.99

172.896

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX550	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G2D Mark	396	336
PassMark - G3D Mark	4527	3446
Geekbench - OpenCL	34265	8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	102.448	47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1017.021	782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.996	3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	87.46	51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	587.99	172.896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3355

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX550	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Code name	TU117	GM107
Launch date	2022	3 December 2015
Place in performance rating	452	700
Type		Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1320 MHz	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	1065 MHz	1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	42.24 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	2.703 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.703 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	640
Pixel fill rate	21.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	42.24 GTexel/s	43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,405 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7 (6.4)	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96.00 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus