NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 967 MHz
2575.3x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 30.94 GTexel / s
5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 244
5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 1330
10.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43499 vs 4267

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 Dec 2021 vs 9 January 2013
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz vs 967 MHz
Texture fill rate	79.68 GTexel/s vs 30.94 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	480 vs 244
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753 vs 1330
Geekbench - OpenCL	43499 vs 4267

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Around 28% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 735 MHz
2.3x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Around 68% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 461 vs 274

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	941 MHz vs 735 MHz
Memory clock speed	4012 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	461 vs 274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

480

244

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7753

1330

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

43499

4267

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

274

461

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
PassMark - G2D Mark	480	244
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753	1330
Geekbench - OpenCL	43499	4267
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	274	461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3334

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Code name	GA107	GK107
Launch date	17 Dec 2021	9 January 2013
Place in performance rating	348	1141
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz	967 MHz
Core clock speed	735 MHz	941 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	159.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.20 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.100 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	384
Pixel fill rate	39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.68 GTexel/s	30.94 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	50 Watt
Floating-point performance		742.7 gflops
Transistor count		1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	35 mm, 1.4 inches
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm, 9 inches
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	113 mm, 4.4 inches
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 API
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	64.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	4012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		DDR3 / GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus