NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 1192.5x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 6332
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43499 vs 20732
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 vs 6332 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 vs 20732 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 480
- Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 274
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 480 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 vs 274 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 650 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 6332 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 | 20732 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 274 | 305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA107 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 348 | 487 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 145 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs
ATIFirePro V5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
