NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 336
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 6514
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43499 vs 39228

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 735 MHz
• 6.9x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• 11.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	480 336
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7753 6514
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	43499 39228
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 3172

Compare specifications (specs)