NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1124 MHz
1772.2x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 217
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 2577
4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43499 vs 9744

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 Dec 2021 vs 13 March 2015
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	79.68 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	480 vs 217
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753 vs 2577
Geekbench - OpenCL	43499 vs 9744

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Around 24% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 735 MHz
Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
12.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 274

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	914 MHz vs 735 MHz
Memory clock speed	1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3350 vs 274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

480

217

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7753

2577

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

43499

9744

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

274

3350

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
PassMark - G2D Mark	480	217
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753	2577
Geekbench - OpenCL	43499	9744
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	274	3350
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3358

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell
Code name	GA107	GM107
Launch date	17 Dec 2021	13 March 2015
Place in performance rating	348	797
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	735 MHz	914 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	159.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.20 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.100 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	640
Pixel fill rate	39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.68 GTexel/s	44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,439 gflops
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support		1
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	35 mm, 1.4 inches
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	229 mm, 9 inches
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	113 mm, 4.4 inches
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	32 or 80 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	1000 or 2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3 or GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI