NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 4% higher core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 705 MHz
Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 876 MHz
235.7x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
12.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 375 Watt
250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43513 vs 22732

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 Dec 2021 vs 28 May 2014
Core clock speed	735 MHz vs 705 MHz
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz vs 876 MHz
Texture fill rate	79.68 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 375 Watt
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	43513 vs 22732

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2.8x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 2048
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 vs 478
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 7754
67.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 253

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2x 2880 vs 2048
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	639 vs 478
PassMark - G3D Mark	8905 vs 7754
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	17055 vs 253

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

478

639

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7754

8905

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

43513

22732

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

253

17055

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
PassMark - G2D Mark	478	639
PassMark - G3D Mark	7754	8905
Geekbench - OpenCL	43513	22732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	253	17055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2226

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Code name	GA107	GK110B
Launch date	17 Dec 2021	28 May 2014
Place in performance rating	343	340
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,999
Price now		$1,580
Type		Desktop
Value for money (0-100)		6.46
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz	876 MHz
Core clock speed	735 MHz	705 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	159.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.20 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.100 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	2x 2880
Pixel fill rate	39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.68 GTexel/s	338 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	375 Watt
CUDA cores		5760
Floating-point performance		2x 5,046 gflops
Transistor count		7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	35 mm, 1.4 inches	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm, 9 inches	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 8-pin
Width	113 mm, 4.4 inches
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	672 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA