NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 914 MHz
• Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 3x more pipelines: 1920 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
• 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 2577
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 217
• 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 9744
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 42.396
• 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 373.644
• 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 2.54
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 39.412
• 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 139.158
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 4148
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3715
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3358
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 4148
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3715
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
• 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 1242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14119 2577
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	746 217
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	71402 9744
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	217.04 42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3119.736 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.707 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	133.975 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1141.283 139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20094 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7442 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6714 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20094 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7442 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6714 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1242 3350

Compare specifications (specs)