NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- Around 15% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1664
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2000x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 9640
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 28498
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 105.107
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 1225.96
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 8.737
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 35.714
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 490.688
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 11499
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3698
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3340
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 11499
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3698
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3340
- 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 vs 369
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2019 vs 19 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 1664 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 vs 9640 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 vs 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 vs 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 vs 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 vs 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 vs 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 vs 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 vs 369 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 148 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 746
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 746 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2019 | 19 September 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $329 |
| Place in performance rating | 161 | 371 |
| Price now | $349.99 | $407.76 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | 28.59 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 1664 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 5,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||

