NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1252 MHz
- 7.5x more pipelines: 1920 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 1651
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 435
- 23.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 3053
- 10.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 19.856
- 10.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 309.824
- 15.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 1.38
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 25.011
- 13.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 84.489
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 2709
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 2875
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3328
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 2709
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 2875
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3328
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 vs 617
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 vs 7 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1252 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 vs 1651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 vs 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 vs 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 vs 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 vs 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 vs 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 vs 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 vs 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 vs 617 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 160 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 | 1651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 | 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 | 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU106 | GP107 |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 | 7 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $119.99 |
Place in performance rating | 161 | 983 |
Price now | $349.99 | $119.99 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | 18.70 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | 1252 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 256 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s |