NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1228 MHz
- Environ 34% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1252 MHz
- 7.5x plus de pipelines: 1920 versus 256
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 4012 MHz
- 8.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 1651
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 versus 435
- 23.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 3053
- 10.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 19.856
- 10.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 309.824
- 15.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 1.38
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 25.011
- 13.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 84.489
- 7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 2709
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 2875
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3328
- 7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 2709
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 2875
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3328
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 versus 617
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 7 February 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1228 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1252 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 256 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 4012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 1651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 versus 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 versus 617 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P400
- 5.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 160 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 | 1651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 | 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 | 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 | 617 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU106 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 7 February 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $119.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 161 | 983 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | $119.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | 18.70 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1252 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 256 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 3,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 679.9 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.25 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 32.1 GB / s |