NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 588
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 vs 10972
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 11029
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 11029
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 7766
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 7766
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 8 August 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 588 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 vs 10972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 7766 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7453 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 588 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 10972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 128 | 158 |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s |