NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 250 Watt
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76051 vs 74179
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 19571
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3717
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3357
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 19571
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3717
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 76051 vs 74179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20002 vs 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 10384 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10130 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20002 vs 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 10384 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10130 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

  • Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • 10.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18733 vs 13735
  • Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 620
  • Around 90% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 7343
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1440 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 18733 vs 13735
PassMark - G2D Mark 795 vs 620
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 13943 vs 7343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13735
18733
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
620
795
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
76051
74179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20002
19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10384
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10130
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20002
19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10384
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10130
3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7343
13943
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark 13735 18733
PassMark - G2D Mark 620 795
Geekbench - OpenCL 76051 74179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20002 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 10384 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10130 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20002 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 10384 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10130 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7343 13943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1534.582

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104B TU102
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 121 122
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $6,299

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1080 MHz 1770 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz 1440 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560
Pixel fill rate 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 18,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6