NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 250 Watt
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 19571
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3717
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3357
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 19571
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3717
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3357

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 W vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20002 vs 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	10384 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10130 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20002 vs 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	10384 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10130 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 930 MHz
Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
10.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 13925
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 632
Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 68337
Around 90% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 7348

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1440 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	18872 vs 13925
PassMark - G2D Mark	791 vs 632
Geekbench - OpenCL	74179 vs 68337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	13943 vs 7348

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13925

18872

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

632

791

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

68337

74179

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20002

19571

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10384

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10130

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20002

19571

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10384

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10130

3357

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

7348

13943

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	13925	18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	632	791
Geekbench - OpenCL	68337	74179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20002	19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	10384	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10130	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20002	19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	10384	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10130	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7348	13943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1534.582

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Code name	TU104B	TU102
Launch date	2 Apr 2020	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	114	112
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$6,299
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1080 MHz	1770 MHz
Core clock speed	930 MHz	1440 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560
Pixel fill rate	69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 W	250 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	18,600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6