NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 vs 10972
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 588
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 170.923
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 3178.443
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 16.732
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1231.051
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 11029
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 11029
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 8 August 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 vs 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 vs 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 3178.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 16.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 1231.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 11029 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 vs 158.103
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 3718
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 3718
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 vs 158.103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 3718 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 | 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 588 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3178.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 16.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 173.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1231.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $6,999 |
Place in performance rating | 133 | 158 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1440 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 4096 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 13.6 B | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |