NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14796 vs 10925
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21840 vs 13044
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21840 vs 13044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 215 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14796 vs 10925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21840 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21840 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 789
  • Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 186736 vs 95313
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3718
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3359
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3718
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3359
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 796 vs 789
Geekbench - OpenCL 186736 vs 95313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14796
10925
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
789
796
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
95313
186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21840
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21840
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 14796 10925
PassMark - G2D Mark 789 796
Geekbench - OpenCL 95313 186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21840 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21840 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 30936
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104 Vega 10
Launch date 2 July 2019 13 August 2018
Launch price (MSRP) $499 $999
Place in performance rating 43 5
Type Desktop Workstation
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 1605 MHz 1200 MHz
CUDA cores 2560
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 88 C
Pipelines 2560
Render output units 64
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 215 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 13.6 B 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4
Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 4.556” (115.7mm)
Length 10.5” (266.74mm) 267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 6 pin + 8 pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width 2-Slot
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready