NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18245 vs 13932
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 815
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 100123 vs 69812
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 171.616
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 16.925
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1195.863
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 13044
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 13044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18245 vs 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100123 vs 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 vs 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 158.103
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3718
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3359
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3718
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3359
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 vs 158.103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18245 | 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100123 | 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 247.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 30936 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 134 | 118 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 13.6 B | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |