NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18251 versus 13932
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 versus 815
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99847 versus 69812
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 171.616
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 16.925
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1195.863
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 13044
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 13044
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18251 versus 13932 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 versus 815 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 versus 69812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 171.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 4031.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 16.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1195.863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 13044 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 versus 158.103
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 versus 3718
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 versus 3359
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 versus 3718
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 versus 3359
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 versus 158.103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18251 | 13932 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 815 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | 69812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 171.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 4031.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 16.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 247.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1195.863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 30936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 30936 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 118 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $999 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 12,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
